|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmacological Management
of Coronary Disease By: M. Mohsen Ibrahim,
MD Prof. of Cardiology
- President of the Egyptian
Hypertension Society The role of pharmacologic
therapy in management of coronary artery disease is possibly underestimated
in the current era of coronary interventions where the main focus of
attention is directed to PCI, stents and developing new types of stents.
Interventional therapy targets only focal manifestations of a systemic
disorder. In addition to culpurit lesion seen in coronary angiogram,
there are other active unstable plaques that are not encroaching on
coronary artery lumen, but are waiting as timed bombs to rupture and
produce acute coronary events. The ideal approach should address the
diffuse and systemic nature of coronary atherosclerosis. Modern pharmacologic
therapy proved effective in ameliorating ischemia, preventing infarction
and reinfarction and prolonging survival. Following acute myocardial
infarction, aggressive medical anti ischemic therapy e.g., beta adrenergic
blockers, calcium antagonists and nitrates in the maximal tolerable
doses have the same favorable effect as PCI on myocardial perfusions
defects detected by nuclear imaging. The addition of statins and angiotensin
converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) delays the development of atherosclerotic
complications i.e. MI, stroke and death in high risk patients and prolongs
survival. Furthermore, while coronary interventions are limited to the
focal coronary stenotic lesion, drug therapy can also address atherosclerotic
disease in other territories e.g. carotid, cerebral and peripheral arteries
which is commonly present with coronary atherosclerosis. In patients
with stable non acute coronary disease, the results of drug therapy
regarding development of MI and survival were similar, sometimes better
than PCI. Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque This is the mother of all
evil. It develops early in life and produces symptoms by encroaching
on coronary artery lumen or by rupture with thrombus formation occluding
the coronary artery and resulting in acute coronary syndromes (ACS)
. Strategies addressing atherosclerotic
plaques aim at its regression and/or stabilization i.e. makes it less
prone to rupture. Plaques liable to rupture are known as vulnerable
plaques. Vulnerable or unstable plaques are characterized by having
a large lipid core rich in cholesterol esters, thin fibrous cap separating
the lipid core from the coronary artery lumen. The thin cap contains
few collagen fibres and is poor in smooth muscle cells- which are the
main source for collagen formation. Collagen gives the tensile strength
to the fibrous cap and
resists rupture. Also vulnerable plaques contain many inflammatory
cells namely, macrophages and T-lymphocytes. Macrophages produce proteolytic
enzymes known as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) which degrade the
collagen and weaken the fibrous cap. Vulnerable plaques remain clinically
silent until they rupture or their covering endothelium is eroded, exposing
the contents of their strongly thrombogenic core to blood stream. Tissue
factor in the lipid core activates blood clotting resulting in thrombin
generation. Also exposed are adhesion molecules e.g., collagen and von
Willebrand factor which activate blood platelets particularly the fibrinogen
receptors (GP II b / III a receptors) resulting in the formation of
platelet thrombi. The process of plaque unstabiity, rupture, platelet
and fibrin thrombi formation is favoured and potentiated by a local
and systemic inflammatory state and a general tendency to blood coagulation-
a procoagulant state. Plaque passivation or stabilization
can be achieved by aggressive lipid lowering, improving endothelial
function, suppressing the systemic and local proinfalmmatory and procoagulant
states and decreasing stress on the palque. Pharmacologic agents that
help in stabilizing the vulnerable plaque include statins, ACE-I, beta
adrenergic blockers, aspirin, antibiotics and anticoagulants. Statins
in addition to reduction in the lipid core, they change the plaque composition
favoring cholesterol crystals formation which are more solid than cholesterol
esters. Also statins have anti inflammatory effects and improve endothelial
function. ACE-I stabilize plaques by inhibiting enzymes degrading the
fibrous cap (MMPs), and decreasing wall stress. ACE-I have also antiinfalmmatory
effects and antithrombotic potential. The second target of pharmacologic
therapy is the thrombus formed within and on the ruptured plaque occluding
partially or totally the coronary artery lumen. Coronary thrombi are
dynamic structures, they develop and dissolve depending upon the activity
of the endogenous lytic system. Once occluding coronary thrombi develop,
the immediate aim of drug therapy is to dissolve them and prevent their
extension. In persistent total occlusion with fibrin rich thrombi i.e.
MI, thrombolytic therapy should be initiated immediately to restore
flow. In partial or intermittent occlusion by platelet rich thrombi
in non ST elevation acute coronary syndromes the aim is to prevent thrombus
extension and to relieve ischemia by antiplatelet, anticoagulant and
antiischemic therapy. Thrombolytic therapy is the
principal pharmacologic intervention in MI. However, it has its limitations.
Primary failure occurs in more than 15% possibly due to platelet rich
thrombi that can not be dissolved by fibrinolytic therapy. Reocculsion
occurs in 10% at hospital discharge following lytic therapy and in 30%
within one year. Complete coronary patency i.e., achieving TIMI 3 flow
is possible only in 40%. Even in spite of good epicardial coronary flow
there is myocyte perfusion failure in about 20%. The
effects of lytic therapy are time dependent, delay in initiation will
attenuate its beneficial effects, furthermore there is a delay in canalization
of 45 minutes after start of therapy. A long list of contraindications
is present and some complications may develop after lytic therapy. To overcome some of the previous
limitations, newer thrombolytics were developed e.g. tenecteplase, which
are more fibrin specific and of long duration of action allowing bolus
administration. Another approach is to add to lytic therapy antiplatelets,
antithrombin and anticoagulants (adjunctive therapy). The adjunctive use of antiplatelets
GP II b/ III a blockers will target the platelet components of the occluding
thrombus which are resistant to thrombolytics and will allow a smaller
dose of the latter, increasing the safety profile. GP II b/ III a blockers
benefit more troponin positive patients and patients referred to PCI.
However, this adjunctive therapy carries the risk of increased bleeding.
Administration of bolus lytic
therapy at home or in the ambulance- prehospital throbolytic will overcome
the delay limitation and proved effective in improving the outcome with
results similar to primary PCI. A generalized systemic proinfalmmatory
and procoagulant state is present in patients with ACS that persists
for months after MI. It is possibly responsible for the high event rate
during the early weeks following MI. Aspirin has both antiinfammatory
and antiplatelet effects. Antibiotics, namely amoxicillin, azithromycin
(one week each) and clarithromycin (for 3 months) were tried in patients
with ACS with favorable results. Systemic anticoagulation with Warfarin
achieving on INR 2.0-3.0 units proved better than ASA alone in patients
afetr MI. The final therapeutic target
is the myocardium. The aims are its protection against myocyte necrosis,
no reflow phenomenon and reperfusion injury. Pharmacologic agents used
for myocardial protection are undergoing clinical trials and the results
of completed studies are mixed. Drugs used for myocardial protection
include inhibitors of Na/H exchanger in cell membrane (which decreases
C++ inflex) such as cariporide and eniporide, inhibitors of complement
by pexelizumab and adhesion molecules blockers. Other approaches include
supersaturated oxygen and systemic hypothermia.
|
||||||||||||||||||||