Magnitude of the Problem
·
Hypertension is a major health problem in Egypt with a prevalence rate
of 26.3%
among
the adult population (> 25 years)1. Its prevalence
increases with aging,
approximately
50% of Egyptians above the age of 60 years suffer from hypertension.
About
seven million Egyptians had high blood pressure in the year 1993.
·
Risks of hypertension include cardiovascular complications (heart failure,
myocardial
infarction,
atrial fibrillation, aneurysms, dissection), renal (azotemia) and
cerebrovascular
(stroke, transient ischemic attacks "TIA", dementia), resulting
in
disability
and premature death. These risks can be reversed by treatment and
control
of hypertension.
·
Hypertension is poorly managed in Egyptians. The rates of awareness,
treatment and
control
are low. Only 8% of hypertensive Egyptians have their blood pressure
controlled1.
National Guidelines for Developing Countries
·
Hypertension guidelines from rich industrial countries may not be applicable
in
developing
and economically disadvantaged communities.
·
Poverty, high illiteracy rate, inadequate health care system with limited
access
to
medical insurance will limit hypertensive patient's care to the minimal
acceptable
level
rather than the ideal or optimal western care recommended in international
guidelines.
·
Racial, genetic, life style and environmental differences between white
Caucasian
and
black, dark or Asian populations will influence the hypertension mechanisms2,
humoral
profile3,4, type and extent of complications5,6
(renal failure and stroke
more
common in blacks). Also, response to dietary therapy7,8 (low
salt, rich fruit
and
vegetable diet), and antihypertensive drugs (less control with ACE-inhibitors
and
beta adrenergic blockers in blacks)9,10 varies.
·
Risk factors for hypertension and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
such as
obesity,
excess dietary salt intake, diabetes and cigarette smoking are particularly
prevalent
among Egyptians11.
·
Compared to developed countries, hypertensive population in the developing
world
includes a large proportion of young and middle aged individuals because
of
the younger mean age1.
Minimal versus Optimal Care
·
Resources more than science dictate the type of care that can be provided.
Limited
resources
and economic factors will influence the level of management.
·
Guidelines have to make a compromise between what is possible (minimal
care) and
what
is ideal (optimal care), see tables 1, 2. This will have an impact on
evaluation
(getting
the required information with the least expensive methods- relying more
on
detailed
history and physical examination) and on the initiation and type
of therapy
(stressing
dietary therapy, life style, use of less expensive drugs, and initiating
therapy
at higher thresholds of blood pressure).
·
Even a small reduction in blood pressure is worthwhile if absolute targets
prove
difficult
to achieve.
Table 1. Evaluation of Hypertensive Patients
| |
Minimal
Care |
Optimal
Care |
| Detailed History-
Physical Exam. |
+++ |
++ |
| Urine dipstick |
+ |
+ |
| Blood Sugar |
+ |
+ |
| ECG |
+ |
+ |
| Blood tests: urea,
creatinine, lipid profile, K+ |
- |
+ |
| Optic Fundus |
- |
+ |
+++: strongly recommended. +: recommended.
- : not done
+: done if facilities are available.
Table 2. Therapy
| |
Minimal
Care |
Optimal
Care |
| Duration of blood
pressure monitoring before starting drug therapy |
Weeks
to months |
Weeks
to months |
| Life style and
diet therapy |
+++ |
++ |
| Threshold
Blood Pressure
Low risk group
Intermediate risk group
High risk group |
|
|
| 160/100 |
160/100 |
| 150/90 |
140/90 |
| 140/85 |
135/85 |
| Drug of first choice |
Small
dose thiazide |
Individualize |
| Target Blood Pressure
Low & intermediate risk groups
High risk group |
<
140/90
< 135/85 |
<
140/90
< 135/85 |
Definition and Classification
·
Levels of blood pressure 140 mmHg or more systolic and 90 mmHg or more
diastolic
represent the cut points for the current definition of hypertension.
·
The following WHO/ISH classification of the levels of blood pressure
(table 3) is
recommended12.
Table 3. Classification of Blood Pressure Levels
| Category |
Systolic |
Diastolic |
| Optimal |
<120 |
< 80 |
| Normal |
<130 |
<85 |
| High-normal |
130-139 |
85-89 |
| Grade 1 (Mild
Hypertension) |
140-159 |
90-99 |
| Grade 2 (Moderate
Hypertension) |
160-179 |
100-109 |
| Grade 3 (Severe
Hypertension) |
> 180 |
> 110 |
| Isolated Systolic
Hypertension |
> 140 |
<90 |
Diagnosis of Hypertension
·
Persistent elevation of systolic blood pressure above 140 mmHg and/or
diastolic
blood
pressure above 90 mmHg on at least five repeated blood pressure
measurements
in five office visits over a period varying from days to months is
required
to make a diagnosis of hypertension. The frequency of visits and period
of
blood pressure monitoring will be dictated by the severity of hypertension
and
cardiovascular risk profile. Three visits are enough if the blood pressure
is
persistently above 160/100 mmHg or if target organ damage (TOD) is present.
·
Failure to measure blood pressure accurately using a standardized technique
and
failure to realize the variable nature of blood pressure and office
induced
hypertension
(white coat effect) will misclassify individuals. Levels of blood
pressure
measured at home or during daytime ambulatory recording should
be
less than 135/85 mmHg.

Blood Pressure Measurement
·
Use a calibrated, well maintained machine (mercury or aneroid).
·
Examination done in a quiet room after five minutes rest in a relaxed
position,
avoiding
talking, full bladder and withholding for two hours tobacco, eating
and
coffee.
·
Use the appropriate cuff size, following a standardized measurement
technique13,
record
the blood pressure to the nearest 2 mmHg in at least two measurements,
take
the lower reading.Use phase V (disappearance of sounds) for diastolic
blood
pressure.

Evaluation
·
Assess cardiovascular risk and target organ damage (TOD) through a careful
detailed
history
and physical examination with a detailed questioning about current medications.
Body
weight should be checked on each office visit.
·
Urine dipstick analysis should be done in all patients and if possible
blood sugar,
and
a standard 12 lead ECG.
·
If blood testing facilities are available examine blood for urea, creatinine,
potassium,
hemoglobin,
total cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol and triglycerides.
·
Echocardiography is not a part of the routine evaluation.
·
An underlying cause (secondary hypertension) is suspected when hypertension
is
difficult
to control (in spite of triple drug therapy), or if it is severe and
of sudden
onset
particularly in a young subject or above the age of 60 years or if there
is
rapid
deterioration in kidney function. Referral to specialized facilities
is needed in
these
conditions.

Risk Categorization
·
Prognosis in hypertensive patients is highly variable depending largely
on factors other
than
blood pressure such as sex, age, other risk factors, TOD, or history
of
cardiovascular
disease14. Cardiovascular risk can vary more than ten folds
at a
given
blood pressure level15.
·
Hypertensive patients can be categorized according to their risk profile
(adopted
from JNC VI)16.
Group A (low risk): no TOD, no
other risk factors and no associated
cardiovascular disease.
Group B (intermediate risk):
one or more additional risk factors but not
diabetes or TOD (table 4).
Group C (high risk): diabetes,
TOD and/or associated cardiovascular
disease (table 5).
Table 4. Cardiovascular Risk Factors
| - Male gender. |
| - Age > 65 years. |
| - Current cigarette smoking. |
| - Diabetes. |
| - Total S- Cholesterol >240 mg/dl, HDL-C<40
mg/dl or LDL-C >160 mg/dl |
| - Positive family history: atherosclerotic
cardiovascular disease in first degree relative before the age
of 40 years in males and 50 years in females. |
Table 5. Target Organ Damage and Associated Atherosclerotic
Diseases
| - Left ventricular hypertrophy: by clinical, ECG,
or echo. |
| - Heart failure: clinical manifestations. |
| - Coronary disease: angina, myocardial infarction,
history of CABG or PCI. |
| - Renal disease: serum creatinine >1.8 mg/dl, proteinuria. |
| - Cerebrovascular disease: stroke, TIA, dementia. |
| - Peripheral arterial disease. |
| - Abdominal aortic aneurysm. |
| - More than grade 1 optic fundus retinopathy. |
Life Style Modification
·
Recommended in all hypertensive patients and should be the initial therapeutic
approach
in mild hypertension.
·
Limit calorie intake in overweight individuals (BMI > 25 kg/m2)
aiming at a
weight
reduction of 5 Kg.
·
Limit salt (sodium chloride) intake to less than 6 gm/day.
·
Encourage fruits and vegetables consumption (6-8 portions/day).
·
Limit intake of total and saturated fats, encourage fish and fat free
dairy products.
·
Increase physical activity by regular exercise e.g. 30 minutes brisk
walk/day.
·
Combined diet, exercise and weight control may limit the need to drug
therapy,
allow
step down or even discontinuation17.
·
Limit alcohol intake and stop cigarette smoking.
Initiation and Monitoring of Drug Therapy
·
Unless there is an emergency or blood pressure > 210/120 mmHg, no
drug
treatment
should be instituted during the first two office visits so as
to rule
out
the presence of "white coat" hypertension.
·
Duration of blood pressure monitoring before initiating drug therapy
varies
depending
upon blood pressure level, risk profile and response to life style
modification.
·
Threshold for antihypertensive drug treatment is 160/100 mmHg in low
risk
group, 140-150/90 mmHg for intermediate risk group and 135-140/85
mmHg
in high risk group.The previous blood pressure cut points are the
average
of blood pressure readings taken on three separate office visits at
least
one week apart.
·
Start with a small dose of thiazide diuretics in all patients with mild
to
moderate
hypertension unless they are contraindicated or there are specific
indications
for other agents.
·
In absence of adequate blood pressure response (fall in systolic blood
pressure
by 10 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by 5 mmHg) after one to
two
months of drug therapy, add another drug from a different pharmacologic
group or use single dose combination.
·
Treatment and follow-up should continue indefinitely.
·
Recheck blood pressure at one to two monthly intervals until blood pressure
remains
at target level for two consecutive visits then recheck at 3 to
6 month
intervals
depending upon the risk profile.
·
Antihypertensive drugs require a period of up to two months to achieve
their
maximal
hypotensive effect18. Do not change drugs at short intervals.

Hypertension Associated with Target Organ Damage
·
Treatment should be more aggressive in this group aiming at a target
blood pressure
less
than 135/85 mmHg and initiated after a shorter monitoring period
(two
to four weeks).
·
Drugs of first choice depend upon TOD:
-
Renal disease: ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)+
thiazide
diuretics (loop diuretic if serum creatinine is above 2.5 mg/dl).
-
Cerebrovascular disease: reduce the blood pressure after the acute phase
of
stroke by thiazide diuretic, and if necessary ACE- inhibitors, ARBs
or
Ca antagonist. Urgent blood pressure lowering is recommended in cerebral
infarction if blood pressure is 220/120 mmHg or greater (180/105
mmHg in patients with cerebral hemorrhage).
Do not lower mean blood pressure by more than 25% in the first two hours
, then toward 160/100 mmHg within the next six hours.
-
Coronary disease: beta adrenergic blockers, ACE-inhibitors and if necessary
Calcium antagonists.
-
Heart failure: ACE-inhibitors + thiazide diuretics.
Hypertension in Special Groups
·
Elderly: start with small dose of thiazide diuretics and add calcuim
antagonists or
ARBs
if necessary. Check blood pressure always in the supine and standing
positions.
Be aware of the marked fluctuations in blood pressure, the auscultatory
gap
when measuring blood pressure and the frequent comorbid conditions.
·
Diabetes mellitus: initiate drug therapy within days after confirming
the diagnosis of
hypertension
aiming at a target blood pressure of less than 140/85 mmHg, and even
lower
levels in presence of proteinuria. Start with ACE-inhibitors and add
thiazide
diuretics,
calcium antagonists, beta blockers or ARBs if necessary. In presence
of
protenuria
ARBs may replace ACE-inhibitors as initial therapy.

Compliance
·
Non compliance is probably the major cause of failure to control hypertension.
·
Measures to improve compliance include patient education, use of less
expensive
medications,
single daily dosage, fixed dose drug combination, continuous monitoring
by
spouse, nurse or doctor and home blood pressure self measurement.
Implementation Strategies
·
Adoption of the guidelines by government agencies as the standard of
care to be
followed
by physicians.
·
Increase physician's awareness: printed material, seminars and meetings.
·
Educational sessions with local opinion leaders nationwide.
·
Reminder system and audit with feedback if available.
References
- Ibrahim MM, Rizk H, Apple LJ, et al. For the NHP investigation
team. Hypertension,
prevalence, awareness, treatment and control in Egypt. Results from
the Egyptian
National hypertension Project (NHP). Hypertension 1995; 26:880.
- Rockstroh J.K., Schmieder RE, Schlaich MP, et al.
Renal and systemic hemodynamics
in black and white hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 1997; 10:971.
- Savage DD, Watkins LO, Grim CE, Kumanyika SK. Hypertension
in black populations.
In Laragh JH, Brenner BM (eds). Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis
and management,
1st edu. Raven Press, Ltd: New York, 1990, pp 1837-1852.
- Weissberg PL, Woods KL, West MJ, Beevers DG. Genetic
and ethnic influences on the
distribution of sodium and potassium in normotensive and hypertensive
subjects.
J Clin Hypertens 1987; 3:20.
- Schmieder RE, Rockstroh JK, Luchters G, et al. Comparison
of early target organ damage
between blacks and whites with mild systemic arterial hypertension.
Am J Cardial 1997; 79:1695
- Klagg ML, Whelton PK, Randall BL et al. End-stage
renal disease in African American and white
men: 16 year MRFIT findings. JAMA 1997; 227:1293.
- Appel LJ, Moor TJ, Obarzanek E, et al. for the DASH
Collaborative Research Group. A clinical
trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. N Engl
J Med. 1997; 336:1117.
- Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, et al. For the DASH-Sodium
Collaborative Research Group.
Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary
Approach to Stop
Hypertension (DASH) diet. N Engl J Med 2001; 334:3.
- Parag KB, Seedat YK. Do angiotensin-converting enzyme
inhibitors work in black hypertensives?
A review. J Hum Hypertens 1990; 4: 450.
- Seedat YK. Varying responses to hypotensive agents
in different racial groups: black versus white
differences. J Hypertens 1989; 7:515.
- Ibrahim MM, Appel LJ, Rizk HH et al. Cardiovascular
risk factors in normotensive and hypertensive
Egyptians. J Hypertens 2001; 19: 1993.
- Chalmers J, MacMahons, Mancia G, et al. WHO-ISH Hypertension
Guidelines Committee. 1999
World Health Organization. International Society of Hypertension Guidelines
for the Management
of Hypertension. J Hypertens 1999; 17:151.
- Perloff D, Grim C, Flock J, et al. Human blood pressure
determination by sphygmomanometry.
Circulation 1993; 88: 2460.
- Kannel WB. Blood pressure as a cardiovascular risk
factor. JAMA 1996;275:1571.
- Kannel WB. Risk stratification in hypertension: New
insights from the Framingham Study.
Am J Hypertens 2000; 13:35.
- Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection,
Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.
The Sixth Report. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157:2413.
- Miller ER, Erlinger TM, Young DR et al. Results of
the Diet, Exercise and Weight Loss Intervention
Trial (DEW-IT). Hypertension 2002; 40:612.
- Ibrahim MM, Mossallam R. Clinical evaluation of atenolol
in hypertensive patients. Circulation 1981; 64:368.