الى الركن العربى
Username:   
Password:   

Register

  Search

     
All Words Any Words
 
 
EHS President's Message
 
President's Message - July 2010

The Beta Blockade Dilemma

The role of beta-adrenergic blocking drugs in the initial management of hypertensive patients has been recently challenged after the publication of the results of two large drug trials (LIFE and ASCOT) and meta-analysis (Lindholm et al.) to the extent that the recent British Hypertension Society Guidelines and the NICE Hypertension Recommendations (2006) stated that "beta-blockers (BB) are no longer preferred as routine initial therapy". This was followed by a number of editorials and comments which stressed the same opinion, that BB should not be among several choices for initial therapy of hypertension. In patients with uncomplicated hypertension, there is paucity of data or absence of evidence to support use of BB as monotherapy or as first-line agents.

However, this policy is not uniformally accepted and
a different point of view is taken by other investigators and international organizations. In 2003 WHO/ISH statement on management of hypertension, "the meta-analysis shows no significant differences between drug classes or between groups of old and new drugs." The recent ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of hypertension (2007) stated that "all 5 major antihypertensive agents (including BB) are suitable for the initiation of therapy" and that "comparative randomized trials show that for similar blood pressure (BP) reductions, differences in the incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality between different drug classes are small." The 2009 Canadian Hypertension  Education Program Recommendations stated that "initial therapy for adults without compelling indications for specific agents should be monotherapy with a thiazide diuretic; a beta-blocker (in patients younger than 60 years of age, long acting CCB, ………". In 2009 reappraisal of European Guidelines, the document stated that "diuretics, ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists, angiotensin receptor antagonists, and BB do not differ significantly for their ability to reduce BP in hypertension and that all the agents can be considered suitable for initiation of antihypertensive treatment, as well as for its maintenance".

In an attempt to resolve controversies regarding cardiovascular protection,
a number of meta-analyses have been performed (table 1). The meta-analysis of Law and others (2009) is the largest ever reported including 464000 participants in 147 randomized trials concluded that with the exception of the extra protective effect of BB given shortly after MI and the minor additional effect of CCB in preventing stroke, all the classes of BP lowering drugs have a similar effect in reducing coronary heart disease events and stroke for a given reduction in BP.

Table (1): Meta-Analysis

Authors/Study

Year

Comparison

No of Trials

No of Pts

Results

BPLTTC

2003

Pl, D

29

162000

With

Carlberg

2004

Pl, D

9

24496

Against

Lindholm

2005

Pl, D

18

127879

Against

Khan

2006

Pl,D, Y,O

21

145811

With

BPLTTC

2008

Pl, D, Y, O

31

190606

With

Law

2009

Pl, D

147

464000

With

Pl: Placebo, D: drug, Y: young, O: old.

With: results of BB better than placebo, same or better than other drug.

Against: results of BB worse than other drug.

Conclusions: BB are effective antihypertensive drugs, they improve CV morbidity and mortality and they are more beneficial in selected patients. They are the drugs of first choice in hypertensive patients with coronary heart disease, heart failure, tachyarrhythmias and glaucoma. However, not all BB are the same, the presence of cardioselectivity is advantageous.

Suggested Readings

  • Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabiti-Rosei E, Ambrosioni E, et al. Reappraisal of European Guidelines on Hypertension Management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document. J Hyperten 2009; 27(11): 2121-2158

  • Cruickshank J M. Are we misunderstanding beta-blockers. Intern J Cardiol 2007 ;120: 10-27.

  • Mancia G. Prevention of risk factors: beta-blockade and hypertension. Eur Heart J Suppl (2009) 11 (suppl A): A3-A8.

  • Bangalore S, Messerli F H, Kostis J B and Pepine C J. Cardiovascular Protection Using Beta-Blockers  A Critical Review of the Evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50;563-572.

  • Fowler M B. Hypertension, Heart Failure, and Beta-Adrenergic Blocking Drugs. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 52:1073-1075.

  • Holman R R, Bethel M A, Neil H A W, Matthews D R. Long-Term Follow-up after Tight Control of Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1565-76.

  • Effects of different regimens to lower blood pressure on major cardiovascular events in older and younger adults: meta-analysis of randomised trials Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. BMJ 2008;336:1121-1123

  • Khan N, McAlister F A. Re-examining the efficacy of b-blockers for the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2006; 174(12): 1737

  • Law M R, Morris J K, Wald N J. Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies. BMJ 2009; 338: b1665

  •  

    President of the Egyptian Hypertension Society

    M. Mohsen Ibrahim, MD
    Prof. of Cardiology- Cairo University
    President of the Egyptian Hypertension Society


    EHS Website Group
     
    About Us  |  Contact Us  | Designed By Sesamina Inc